Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/111619
Título: Post-acute phase and sequelae management of epidermal necrolysis: an international, multidisciplinary DELPHI-based consensus
Autor: Ingen-Housz-Oro, S.
Schmidt, V.
Ameri, M. M.
Abe, R.
Brassard, A.
Mostaghimi, A.
Paller, A. S.
Romano, A.
Didona, B.
Kaffenberger, B. H.
Ben Said, B.
Thong, B. Y. H.
Ramsay, B.
Brezinova, E.
Milpied, B.
Mortz, C. G.
Chu, C. Y.
Sotozono, C.
Gueudry, J.
Fortune, D. G.
Dridi, S. M.
Tartar, D.
Do-Pham, G.
Gabison, E.
Phillips, E. J.
Lewis, F.
Salavastru, C.
Horvath, B.
Dart, J.
Setterfield, J.
Newman, J.
Schulz, J. T.
Delcampe, A.
Brockow, K.
Seminario-Vidal, L.
Jörg, L.
Watson, M. P.
Gonçalo, M. 
Lucas, M. C. Marco de 
Torres, M.
Noe, M. H.
Hama, N.
Shear, N. H.
O'Reilly, P.
Wolkenstein, P.
Romanelli, P.
Dodiuk-Gad, R. P.
Micheletti, R. G.
Tiplica, G. S.
Sheridan, R.
Rauz, S.
Ahmad, S.
Chua, S. L.
Flynn, T. H.
Pichler, W.
Le, S. T.
Maverakis, E.
Walsh, N. 
French, L. E.
Brüggen, M. C.
Palavras-chave: Epidermal necrolysis; Stevens-Johnson syndrome; Toxic epidermal necrolysis; Sequelae; Quality of life; Delphi; Consensus
Data: 22-Fev-2023
Editora: BMJ
Título da revista, periódico, livro ou evento: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Volume: 18
Número: 1
Resumo: Background Long-term sequelae are frequent and often disabling after epidermal necrolysis (Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)). However, consensus on the modalities of management of these sequelae is lacking. Objectives We conducted an international multicentric DELPHI exercise to establish a multidisciplinary expert consensus to standardize recommendations regarding management of SJS/TEN sequelae. Methods Participants were sent a survey via the online tool “Survey Monkey” consisting of 54 statements organized into 8 topics: general recommendations, professionals involved, skin, oral mucosa and teeth, eyes, genital area, mental health, and allergy workup. Participants evaluated the level of appropriateness of each statement on a scale of 1 (extremely inappropriate) to 9 (extremely appropriate). Results were analyzed according to the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Results Fifty-two healthcare professionals participated. After the first round, a consensus was obtained for 100% of 54 initially proposed statements (disagreement index < 1). Among them, 50 statements were agreed upon as ‘appropriate’; four statements were considered ‘uncertain’, and ultimately finally discarded. Conclusions Our DELPHI-based expert consensus should help guide physicians in conducting a prolonged multidisciplinary follow-up of sequelae in SJS-TEN.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/111619
ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02631-7
Direitos: openAccess
Aparece nas coleções:FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Mostrar registo em formato completo

Visualizações de página

36
Visto em 8/mai/2024

Downloads

20
Visto em 8/mai/2024

Google ScholarTM

Verificar

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este registo está protegido por Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons