Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/109233
Title: Copy number variants prioritization after array-CGH analysis - a cohort of 1000 patients
Authors: Carreira, Isabel Marques 
Ferreira, Susana Isabel 
Matoso, Eunice 
Pires, Luís Miguel 
Ferrão, José 
Jardim, Ana 
Mascarenhas, Alexandra 
Pinto, Marta 
Lavoura, Nuno 
Pais, Claudia 
Paiva, Patrícia 
Simões, Lúcia 
Caramelo, Francisco 
Ramos, Lina 
Venâncio, Margarida 
Ramos, Fabiana
Beleza, Ana
Sá, Joaquim 
Saraiva, Jorge 
Melo, Joana Barbosa de 
Keywords: Array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH); Copy number variation (CNV) classification; Intellectual disability; Multiple congenital anomalies; Learning difficulties; Autism spectrum disorders
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Springer Nature
Serial title, monograph or event: Molecular Cytogenetics
Volume: 8
Issue: 1
Abstract: Background: Array-based comparative genomic hybridization has been assumed to be the first genetic test offered to detect genomic imbalances in patients with unexplained intellectual disability with or without dysmorphisms, multiple congenital anomalies, learning difficulties and autism spectrum disorders. Our study contributes to the genotype/phenotype correlation with the delineation of laboratory criteria which help to classify the different copy number variants (CNVs) detected. We clustered our findings into five classes ranging from an imbalance detected in a microdeletion/duplication syndrome region (class I) to imbalances that had previously been reported in normal subjects in the Database of Genomic Variants (DGV) and thus considered common variants (class IV). Results: All the analyzed 1000 patients had at least one CNV independently of its clinical significance. Most of them, as expected, were alterations already reported in the DGV for normal individuals (class IV) or without known coding genes (class III-B). In approximately 14 % of the patients an imbalance involving known coding genes, but with partially overlapping or low frequency of CNVs described in the DGV was identified (class IIIA). In 10.4 % of the patients a pathogenic CNV that explained the phenotype was identified consisting of: 40 class I imbalances, 44 class II de novo imbalances and 21 class II X-chromosome imbalances in male patients. In 20 % of the patients a familial pathogenic or potentially pathogenic CNV, consisting of inherited class II imbalances, was identified that implied a family evaluation by the clinical geneticists. Conclusions: As this interpretation can be sometimes difficult, particularly if it is not possible to study the parents, using the proposed classification we were able to prioritize the multiple imbalances that are identified in each patient without immediately having to classify them as pathogenic or benign.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/109233
ISSN: 1755-8166
DOI: 10.1186/s13039-015-0202-z
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:I&D IBILI - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
I&D CNC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Show full item record

Page view(s)

62
checked on May 15, 2024

Download(s)

20
checked on May 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons