Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/98952
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorKhaloo, Alireza-
dc.contributor.authorAghabozorgi, Pegah-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-04T15:32:43Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-04T15:32:43Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/98952-
dc.descriptionDocumentos apresentados no âmbito do reconhecimento de graus e diplomas estrangeirospor
dc.description.abstractGlass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars with significant corrosion resistance lead to an improvement in the performance of concrete structures and a significant reduction in costs. High ratio of tensile strength to weight, non conductive, and non-magnetic properties are other features of GFRP bars. Recent international design standards, such as ACI 440.1R-15 do not recommend including FRP reinforcement in compression, so they replace them by concrete in calculations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of concentric and excentric axial loading on the axial capacity and ductility of GFRP reinforced concrete columns compared to steel reinforced concrete columns, comparison of flexural capacity of GFRP reinforced concrete beams with steel reinforced concrete beams, and also the effect of compressive bars on the bending capacity and ductility of GFRP reinforced concrete beams. In this study, concrete beams and columns were modeled using finite element software ,ABAQUS. Experimental data from previous studies were used as a criterion for numerical investigations and the model results were validated using the available experimental data. The results demonstrated that the average load carrying capacity of GFRP reinforced concrete columns is about 93.5 percent of steel reinforced concrete columns. GFRP reinforced concrete columns under concentric loading have greater load carrying capacity than GFRP reinforced concrete columns under eccentric loading which is more significant for steel reinforced concrete columns. The average flexural strength of steel reinforced concrete beam was about 90% of GFRP reinforced concrete beam. Also, the ductility of GFRP concrete beam specimens was greater than that for the steel beam specimen. Using GFRP compression reinforcement resulted in higher energy absorption and ultimately higher ductility of the GFRP concrete beams. Also, the results showed that GFRP compression reinforcement does not significantly increase the flexural strength of beams.pt
dc.language.isootherpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.subjectGFRP barpt
dc.subjectABAQUSpt
dc.subjectColumnpt
dc.subjectBeamspt
dc.subjectLoad carrying capacitypt
dc.subjectductilitypt
dc.subjectFlexural strengthpt
dc.titleNumerical Analysis of Concrete Elements Reinforced with GFRP Bars under Concentric and Eccentric Loadings and Four-point Bendingpt
dc.typemasterThesispt
degois.publication.locationSharif University of Technologypt
dc.date.embargo2019-09-01*
uc.rechabilitacaoestrangeirayespt
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1other-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypemasterThesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:UC - Reconhecimento de graus e diplomas estrangeiros
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Pegha_Aghabozorgi_Thesis.pdfDissertação4.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.