Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/45600
Title: Quantitative support for UX methods identification: how can multiple criteria decision making help?
Authors: Melo, Paulo 
Jorge, Luísa 
Keywords: Multi-criteria matching; MCDM matching; Usability evaluation methods identification; PROMETHEE; SMAA-2
Issue Date: Jun-2015
Project: PEst-OE/ EEI/UI308/2014 
Serial title, monograph or event: Universal Access in the Information Society
Volume: 14
Issue: 2
Abstract: This paper presents views on how quantitative multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches may be applied to certain aspects of user experience design and evaluation (D&E) methods identification, emphasizing its strengths and weaknesses for this task. Often D&E methods need to be applied in contexts different of those they had been applied before and as such must be transferred to those new contexts. This work presents a model for the quantitative method matching step of the transfer process, describes how different MCDM methods can be applied to this task, and discusses the results of an experience that tried to apply a couple of MCDM procedures to method selection.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/45600
DOI: 10.1007/s10209-013-0341-0
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:FEUC- Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Quantitative support for methods transfer_UAIS_tallinn.pdf1.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Feb 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 10

5
checked on Feb 2, 2024

Page view(s)

319
checked on Feb 27, 2024

Download(s) 50

385
checked on Feb 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons