Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/45600
Title: | Quantitative support for UX methods identification: how can multiple criteria decision making help? | Authors: | Melo, Paulo Jorge, Luísa |
Keywords: | Multi-criteria matching; MCDM matching; Usability evaluation methods identification; PROMETHEE; SMAA-2 | Issue Date: | Jun-2015 | Project: | PEst-OE/ EEI/UI308/2014 | Serial title, monograph or event: | Universal Access in the Information Society | Volume: | 14 | Issue: | 2 | Abstract: | This paper presents views on how quantitative multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches may be applied to certain aspects of user experience design and evaluation (D&E) methods identification, emphasizing its strengths and weaknesses for this task. Often D&E methods need to be applied in contexts different of those they had been applied before and as such must be transferred to those new contexts. This work presents a model for the quantitative method matching step of the transfer process, describes how different MCDM methods can be applied to this task, and discusses the results of an experience that tried to apply a couple of MCDM procedures to method selection. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10316/45600 | DOI: | 10.1007/s10209-013-0341-0 | Rights: | openAccess |
Appears in Collections: | FEUC- Artigos em Revistas Internacionais |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quantitative support for methods transfer_UAIS_tallinn.pdf | 1.01 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
6
checked on Aug 26, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
10
5
checked on Aug 2, 2024
Page view(s)
349
checked on Aug 27, 2024
Download(s) 50
430
checked on Aug 27, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License