Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Patient- and Parent-Reported Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth (QoLISSY) Questionnaire||Authors:||Bullinger, Monika
Chaplin, John E.
|Keywords:||Health related quality of life; Short stature; Growth hormone deficiency; Idiopathic short stature; Patient and parent assessment; Outcome research||Issue Date:||2014||Citation:||Bullinger, M., Quitmann, J., Silva, N., Rohenkohl, A., Chaplin, J. E., DeBusk, K., Mimoun, E., Feigerlova, E., Herdman, M., Sanz, D., Wollmann, H., Pleil, A., & Power, M. (2014). Cross-cultural equivalence of the patient- and parent-reported Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth (QoLISSY) Questionnaire. Hormone Research in Paediatrics, 82(1), 18-30. doi:10.1159/000358832||Serial title, monograph or event:||Hormone Research in Paediatrics||Volume:||82||Issue:||1||Abstract:||Background: Testing cross-cultural equivalence of Patient Reported Outcomes requires sufficiently large samples per country, which is difficult to achieve in rare endocrine paediatric conditions. We describe a novel approach to cross-cultural testing of the Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth (QoLISSY) questionnaire in five countries by sequentially Taking-One-Country-Out (TOCO) from the total sample and iteratively comparing the resulting psychometric performance. Methods: Development of the QoLISSY proceeded from focus group discussions over pilot testing to field testing in 268 short statured patients and parents. In exploring cross-cultural equivalence the iterative TOCO technique was used to examine and compare validity, reliability and convergence of QoLISSY patient- and parent-ratings in the field test data set, and to predict QoLISSY scores from clinical, socio-demographic and psychosocial variables. Results: Validity and reliability indicators were satisfactory for each sample after iteratively omitting one country. Comparisons with the total sample revealed cross-cultural equivalence in internal consistency and construct validity for patients and parents, high inter-rater agreement and a substantial proportion of QoLISSY variance explained by predictors. Conclusion: The TOCO technique is a powerful method to overcome problems of country specific testing of PRO instruments. It provides an empirical support to QoLISSY´s cross-cultural equivalence and is recommended for future research.||URI:||http://hdl.handle.net/10316/45419||DOI:||10.1159/000358832||Rights:||openAccess|
|Appears in Collections:||FPCEUC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|Cross-cultural QoLISSY equivalence.pdf||543.83 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
checked on May 29, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Jul 2, 2021
checked on Jul 29, 2021
checked on Jul 29, 2021
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.