Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/112406
Title: Implementation of integrated ecosystem assessments in the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea—conceptualizations, practice, and progress
Authors: Clay, Patricia M.
Ferretti, Johanna
Bailey, Jennifer L.
Goti, Leyre
Dankel, Dorothy J.
Santurtun, Marina
Fuller, Jessica
Linke, Sebastian
Schmidt, Jörn
Nielsen, Kåre Nolde
Goldsborough, David
Groeneveld, Rolf
Fraga, Ana Rita 
Elegbede, Isa
Röckmann, Christine
Keywords: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES); Integrated Ecosystem Assessments (IEAs); Social Science Methods; Semi-Structured Interviews
Issue Date: 2023
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Serial title, monograph or event: ICES Journal of Marine Science
Volume: 80
Issue: 5
Abstract: With increasing activities of multiple sectors in marine spaces, management of marine social–ecological systems requires more holistic ap- proac hes. Adopting suc h an approac h, ho w e v er, presents difficult institutional and disciplinary challenges. Here, w e use the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) as a case study on the implementation of ecosystem-based management (EBM) and integrated ecosystem assessments (IEAs). ICES includes EBM and IEAs in its Science Priorities and established IEA Working Groups (WGs) to carry out regional IEAs. But to what degree does this IEA WG work follow best practices? We examine policy documents, academic literature, and interview data from chairs of all IEA WGs. Results indicate mixed success. All groups acknowledge the holistic goals of IEA, and many use the IEA model as laid out b y L e vin et al . Ho w e v er, w e f ound a significant variation in the degree to which the full model is applied. We identified two primary areas f or impro v ement: (1) integration of social and economic issues and (2) in v olv ement of stak eholders. W e off er e xamples of ho w WGs ha v e been making progress to w ards full IEAs, discuss ho w ICES can further support this transition, and suggest lessons with respect to the adoption of EBM and IEAs more broadly.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/112406
ISSN: 1054-3139
1095-9289
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsad079
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:FEUC- Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons