Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/104653
Title: Dose-Response Relationships between Training Load Measures and Physical Fitness in Professional Soccer Players
Authors: Younesi, Saeid 
Rabbani, Alireza 
Clemente, Filipe Manuel 
Silva, Rui
Sarmento, Hugo 
Figueiredo, António José 
Keywords: football; performance; athletic performance; sports training; internal load; external load
Issue Date: 19-Apr-2021
Publisher: MDPI AG
Project: UIDB /50008/2020 
Spanish government subproject Integration ways between qualitative and quantitative data, multiple case development, and synthesis review as main axis for an innovative future in physical activity and sports research [PGC2018-098742-B-C31] (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Programa Estatal de Generación de Conocimiento y Fortalecimiento Científico y Tecnológico del Sistema I+D+i), that is part of the coordinated project ‘New approach of research in physical activity and sport from mixed methods perspective (NARPAS_MM) [SPGC201800X098742CV0]’ 
Serial title, monograph or event: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume: 18
Issue: 8
Abstract: The aim of this cohort study was two-fold: (i) to analyze within-group changes of final velocity in a 30-15 intermittent fitness test (VIFT), final velocity in a Vameval test (Vvameval), 20-m sprint and countermovement jump (CMJ); (ii) to explore the relationships between VIFT and Vvameval outcomes and their changes with internal and external loads. Twenty-two professional soccer players (mean ± SD; age 27.2 ± 3.4 years, height 174.2 ± 3.6 cm, body mass 69.1 ± 6.4 kg, and body fat 10.4 ± 4.1%, 3.1 ± 1.5 years in the club) participated in this study. External and internal loads were obtained using global positioning system, heart rate and rate of perceived effort (sRPE) after each training session. Players were assessed in CMJ, 20-m sprint, Vameval and 30-15 intermittent fitness test, before and after the observed period. Very large relationships were observed between VIFT and Vameval for pre- (r = 0.76), post (r = 0.80) and pooled-data (r = 0.81). Vvameval showed less sensitivity (-22.4%, [-45.0 to 9.4]), ES -0.45 [-1.05 to 0.16]) than VIFT. ∆VIFT had unclear associations with all sRPE, but had moderate correlations with objective internal and external measures, while, ∆Vvameval varied between large and very large relationships with all sRPE, but had unclear associations with all other selected training loads. Objective internal and external loads may be used to track aerobic power related changes from VIFT.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/104653
ISSN: 1660-4601
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18084321
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:I&D CIDAF - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
FCDEF - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Apr 15, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Apr 2, 2024

Page view(s)

61
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Download(s)

20
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons