Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/103466
Title: Understanding dual career views of European university athletes: The more than gold project focus groups
Authors: Capranica, Laura
Doupona, Mojca
Abelkalns, Ilvis
Bisenieks, Ugis
Sánchez-Pato, Antonio
Cánovas-Alvarez, Francisco José
Figueiredo, António José 
García-Roca, Juan Alfonso
Leiva-Arcas, Alejandro
Meroño, Lourdes
Paegle, Anda
Radu, Liliana-Elisabeta
Rus, Cristian-Mihail
Rusu, Oana-Mihaela
Sarmento, Hugo 
Stonis, Janis
Vaquero-Cristóbal, Raquel
Vaz, Vasco 
Ghinassi, Barbara
Izzicupo, Pascal
Di Baldassarre, Angela
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Project: European Commission under the Erasmus+ Programme [number 603346-EPP-1-2018-1-LVSPO- SCP SCP] 
Serial title, monograph or event: PLoS ONE
Volume: 17
Issue: 2
Abstract: Previous studies have found that student-athletes (S-As) have difficulties in achieving dual career (DC) success. However, no studies have analysed the opinion of the S-As on the functioning of DC with a qualitative methodology. The aim of the present work was to collect the opinions of elite university S-As in relation to DC policy adopted by their academic institutions in different European countries. In total, 77 athletes (F = 35, M = 42; age range: 20-25 years) participated in 15 national face-to-face focus groups in five different countries, to discuss aspects that higher education institutes should implement in relation to: 1) the athletes' needs; 2) assistance/tutorship: 2) curricula requirements; 3) financial support; 4) logistic support; 5) social support; and 6) dual career policies. Fifty of the athletes competed in individual sports and twenty-seven team sports. Of them, 57 was enrolled at undergraduate, 17 was enrolled in a master and 3 in a PhD. The athletes were presented with 13 open-ended questions one by one, and were ensured freedom to interact. All the discussions were recorded. After this, a general discussion took place in which the participants identified and agreed on a final list of statements from their focus group deemed to be relevant to DC athletes as university students. Then, at a consensus meeting, the findings were combined, repetitions were eliminated, and fragmented statements were condensed into broader ones. A final list of 31 statements, organized in six related content units, were identified in relation to the athletes' needs (n = 5), assistance/tutorship (n = 5), curricula requirements (n = 4), financial support (n = 4), logistic support (n = 4), social support (n = 6), and DC policies (n = 3), respectively. In conclusion, this cross-national qualitative research study synthesized the S-As views about their needs and the most relevant DC policies and provisions that higher education institutes should provide to ensure them with positive academic experiences towards the achievement of a degree.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/103466
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264175
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:I&D CIDAF - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Apr 15, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Apr 2, 2024

Page view(s)

56
checked on Apr 9, 2024

Download(s)

23
checked on Apr 9, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons