Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103429
Title: | Bone Response to High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Adolescents with Obesity | Authors: | Julian, Valérie Costa, Daniela O'Malley, Grace Metz, Lore Fillon, Alicia Miguet, Maud Cardenoux, Charlotte Dutheil, Frédéric Boirie, Yves Duclos, Martine Courteix, Daniel Pereira, Bruno Thivel, David |
Keywords: | Childhood obesity; Bone mineral density; Bone strength; High-intensity interval training; Moderate-intensity continuous training | Issue Date: | 2022 | Serial title, monograph or event: | Obesity Facts | Volume: | 15 | Issue: | 1 | Abstract: | Introduction: Since adolescents with obesity are prone to bone fragility during weight loss, the aim was to compare the impact of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on bone density, geometry, and strength. Methods: Sixty-one adolescents were randomly assigned to 2 cycling trainings (HIIT and MICT) and a control (CTR, without training) group. Anthropometry, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with hip structural analysis and the trabecular bone score (TBS) were assessed before and after the 16-week intervention. Results: Body mass index (BMI) and fat mass (FM) percentage decreased at T1 versus T0 in both training groups (p < 0.001 for HIIT, p = 0.01 for MICT), though to a larger extent in HIIT (p < 0.05). Total body bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) increased in both training groups (p < 0.001), but to a greater extent in HIIT for BMC (p < 0.05). Lumbar spine BMD and BMC increased in both training groups (p < 0.001 for HIIT, p < 0.01 for MICT), with a time × group interaction between HIIT and CTR (p < 0.05) only. TBS increased in both training groups (p < 0.01 for HIIT, p < 0.05 for MICT). Hip BMD and BMC increased in both HIIT (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01) and MICT (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). At the narrow neck (NN), endocortical diameter, width (p < 0.01), cross-sectional moment of inertia, and section modulus (Z) (p < 0.05) increased only in the HIIT group, such as BMD and Z (p < 0.05) at the intertrochanteric region (IT) and average cortical thickness (p < 0.001) and width (p < 0.05) at the femoral shaft. At the NN and IT, the buckling ratio decreased only in the HIIT group (p < 0.05), predicting higher resistance to fracture. Conclusions: In addition to inducing greater BMI and FM percentage decreases in comparison to MICT, HIIT improves multisite bone density, geometry, and strength, which heighten the justification for HIIT as part of weight loss interventions in adolescents with obesity. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103429 | ISSN: | 1662-4025 1662-4033 |
DOI: | 10.1159/000519271 | Rights: | openAccess |
Appears in Collections: | I&D CIDAF - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bone-Response-to-HighIntensity-Interval-Training-versus-ModerateIntensity-Continuous-Training-in-Adolescents-with-ObesityObesity-Facts.pdf | 263.03 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
1
checked on Sep 1, 2023
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
1
checked on Sep 2, 2023
Page view(s)
19
checked on Sep 18, 2023
Download(s)
181
checked on Sep 18, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License