Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/100823
Title: | A Stakeholders’ Perspective on Risk Management for Collaborative University-Industry R&D Programs | Authors: | Fernandes, Gabriela Domingues, Joana Tereso, Anabela Pinto, Eduardo |
Keywords: | Risk management; Stakeholders' perspective; University-industry R&D collaborations | Issue Date: | 2021 | Project: | Portugal Incentive System for RT&D. Project in co-promotion nº 039334/2018 | Serial title, monograph or event: | Procedia Computer Science | Volume: | 181 | Abstract: | University-industry collaborative programs provide special challenges in understanding and expressing the value of risk management (RM) in delivering program and project benefits. This paper presents a methodology for managing the risks in major university-industry R&D programs within a stakeholders' perspective. An ethnographic study was conducted on a multi-million euro university-industry collaboration initiative. The RM methodology identifies, for each of the key stakeholders, the RM activities in the program, which are largely derived from research literature. Empirical research then prioritizes and selects key RM activities. The research is informed using a case study involving one university and one large industrial partner. Empirical research was conducted by researchers who observed, for five years, at close quarters, the challenges of managing risk in major collaborative programs. The developed RM methodology takes a stakeholders' perspective, by identifying, for each of the key three stakeholders - Program Manager, Project Manager and Program and Project Management Officer, the respective RM activities. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10316/100823 | ISSN: | 18770509 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.110 | Rights: | openAccess |
Appears in Collections: | I&D CEMMPRE - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S1877050921001472-main.pdf | 706.05 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
3
checked on Nov 17, 2022
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
2
checked on Nov 15, 2022
Page view(s)
28
checked on Oct 2, 2023
Download(s)
20
checked on Oct 2, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License