Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/87545
Title: | The failure to examine failures in democratic innovation | Authors: | Spada, Paolo Ryan, Matt |
Issue Date: | 2017 | Publisher: | Cambridge University Press | Serial title, monograph or event: | PS: Political Science & Politics | Volume: | 50 | Issue: | 3 | Place of publication or event: | Cambridge | Abstract: | Deliberation scholars have changed the landscape of democratic theory irreversibly, providing us with a coherent set of principles that undergird contemporary approaches to democracy making (e.g., Bohman 1998; Gutmann and Thompson 1996). Deliberation has become a normative project owned and invested in by practitioners of democracy worldwide (see Bherer, Gauthier, and Simmard 2016). The relevance of deliberative democracy is clear, as it seeks to respond to a set of disquieting contemporary phenomena that increasingly manifest in declining social capital and trust, and increasing deference to extremist populist appeals. | Description: | To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517000579 | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10316/87545 | ISSN: | 1049-0965 1537-5935 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S1049096517000579 | Rights: | closedAccess |
Appears in Collections: | I&D CES - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Login |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Failure to Examine Failures.pdf | 313.39 kB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.