Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/80823
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Maria J-
dc.contributor.authorPaiva, Joana S-
dc.contributor.authorCastelo-Branco, Miguel-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T10:48:23Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-20T10:48:23Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/80823-
dc.description.abstractWhen engaged in a repetitive task our performance fluctuates from trial-to-trial. In particular, inter-trial reaction time variability has been the subject of considerable research. It has been claimed to be a strong biomarker of attention deficits, increases with frontal dysfunction, and predicts age-related cognitive decline. Thus, rather than being just a consequence of noise in the system, it appears to be under the control of a mechanism that breaks down under certain pathological conditions. Although the underlying mechanism is still an open question, consensual hypotheses are emerging regarding the neural correlates of reaction time inter-trial intra-individual variability. Sensory processing, in particular, has been shown to covary with reaction time, yet the spatio-temporal profile of the moment-to-moment variability in sensory processing is still poorly characterized. The goal of this study was to characterize the intra-individual variability in the time course of single-trial visual evoked potentials and its relationship with inter-trial reaction time variability. For this, we chose to take advantage of the high temporal resolution of the electroencephalogram (EEG) acquired while participants were engaged in a 2-choice reaction time task. We studied the link between single trial event-related potentials (ERPs) and reaction time using two different analyses: (1) time point by time point correlation analyses thereby identifying time windows of interest; and (2) correlation analyses between single trial measures of peak latency and amplitude and reaction time. To improve extraction of single trial ERP measures related with activation of the visual cortex, we used an independent component analysis (ICA) procedure. Our ERP analysis revealed a relationship between the N1 visual evoked potential and reaction time. The earliest time point presenting a significant correlation of its respective amplitude with reaction time occurred 175 ms after stimulus onset, just after the onset of the N1 peak. Interestingly, single trial N1 latency correlated significantly with reaction time, while N1 amplitude did not. In conclusion, our findings suggest that inter-trial variability in the timing of extrastriate visual processing contributes to reaction time variability.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.relationFCT - SFRH/BPD/102188/2014pt
dc.relationUID/NEU/04539/2013-COMPETEpt
dc.relationPOCI-01-0145-FEDER-007440pt
dc.relationPD/BI/114377/2016pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.titleSpontaneous Fluctuations in Sensory Processing Predict Within-Subject Reaction Time Variabilitypt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage200pt
degois.publication.titleFrontiers in Human Neurosciencept
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fnhum.2016.00200pt
degois.publication.volume10pt
dc.date.embargo2016-01-01*
dc.date.periodoembargo0pt
dc.identifier.pmid27242470-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Coimbra-
crisitem.author.researchunitCNC.IBILI-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4364-6373-
Appears in Collections:I&D IBILI - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Jun 25, 2019

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Jun 25, 2019

Page view(s)

49
checked on Oct 2, 2019

Download(s)

44
checked on Oct 2, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Dimensions


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.