Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/48145
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFreire, Maria Raquel-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-02T17:00:20Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-02T17:00:20Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn1996-7845por
dc.identifier.issn2542-2081por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/48145-
dc.descriptionFull text in English and Russian.por
dc.description.abstractThe international system is characterized by increasingly interdependent and asymmetrical relations between the constellations of actors that compose it. While the state remains a central reference in international relations, multilevel and multidimensional relationships make the system very complex. The state, international organizations, non-state actors, club diplomacy and groups of states (e.g., the Group of 20 [G20] and the BRICS grouping of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) all contribute to this complexity and make the global governance system increasingly multifaceted. In this context, this article examines the relationship between the European Union and the BRICS – two very different actors, pursuing formal and informal integration processes, respectively – and assesses the possibilities and limits of cooperation. This article seeks to understand whether the EU – BRICS relationship reflects a strategic partnership or a structural disjuncture. It starts by discussing multilateralism as a cooperation-oriented but sometimes interest-driven tool in a diverse and multilevel governance system. It then analyses EU – BRICS relations, identifying the main drivers and highlighting how the complex context both facilitates and hinders the constitution of this relationship. The article concludes that the EU – BRICS relationship is informed by asymmetries and ambivalence that reflect their different sizes, capacities and approaches. Moreover, although there is a shared understanding that cooperation might be beneficial, contradictory rules and perspectives on the international order mean this potentially positive relationship is nevertheless embedded in fundamental structural constraints.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherNational Research University Higher School of Economicspor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/642709/EUpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectEuropean Unionpor
dc.subjectBRICSpor
dc.subjectGlobal governancepor
dc.subjectMultilateralismpor
dc.subjectNormspor
dc.titleEU Relations with the BRICS: Strategic Partnership or Structural Disjunction?por
dc.title.alternativeЕС и БРИКС: стратегическое партнерство или структурное расхождение?por
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage182por
degois.publication.lastPage200por
degois.publication.issue3por
degois.publication.locationMoscowpor
degois.publication.titleInternational Organisations Research Journalpor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://iorj.hse.ru/en/2017-12-3/211376732.htmlpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.identifier.doi10.17323/1996-7845-2017-03-182por
degois.publication.volume12por
uc.controloAutoridadeSim-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.researchunitCES – Centre for Social Studies-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitUniversity of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2952-6017-
Appears in Collections:I&D CES - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.