Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/36156
Title: How (not What) Shall We Think about Human Rights and Religious Arguments? Public Reasoning and Beyond
Authors: Thaler, Mathias 
Keywords: Human rights; Justification; Modus vivendi; Pluralism; Public reason; Secularism
Issue Date: 2010
Publisher: Centro de Estudos Sociais
Keywords: Human rights; Justification; Modus vivendi; Pluralism; Public reason; Secularism
Issue Date: 2010
Publisher: Centro de Estudos Sociais
Abstract: This paper addresses the question of how (not what) we should think about human rights and religious arguments. Thinking about this relationship is today particularly important, because conflicts over human rights in practice often turn around their theoretical problems. Should religious arguments be used to justify human rights? Or do we want human rights to be free from any partisan endorsement so as to avoid divisive interpretations of universal principles? Underlying these hard questions is the issue of justification in view of a plurality of cultural and religious traditions around the globe. If human rights can be transformed so as to defy the charge of Euro-centrism (of being parochially rooted in only one cultural and religious tradition), they need to creatively draw on, not pit themselves against, this plurality. This paper suggests a framework for such a positive and inclusive engagement with various cultures and religions that goes beyond the mainstream liberal model of “public reason”.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/36156
ISSN: 1647-0737
Other Identifiers: 10.4000/eces.553
DOI: 10.4000/eces.553
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:I&D CES - Artigos em Revistas Nacionais

Show full item record

Page view(s) 10

672
checked on Aug 20, 2019

Download(s)

77
checked on Aug 20, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.