Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/25236
Title: Is NMR Fragment Screening Fine-Tuned to Assess Druggability of Protein−Protein Interactions?
Authors: Dias, David M. 
Van Molle, Inge 
Baud, Matthias G. J. 
Galdeano, Carles 
Geraldes, Carlos F. G. C. 
Ciulli, Alessio 
Keywords: NMR fragment screening; protein−protein interactions; binding affinity; druggability
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: American Chemical Society
Project: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/311460 
Serial title, monograph or event: ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
Volume: 5
Issue: 1
Abstract: Modulation of protein−protein interactions (PPIs) with small molecules has been hampered by a lack of lucid methods capable of reliably identifying high-quality hits. In fragment screening, the low ligand efficiencies associated with PPI target sites pose significant challenges to fragment binding detection. Here, we investigate the requirements for ligand-based NMR techniques to detect rule-of-three compliant fragments that form part of known high-affinity inhibitors of the PPI between the von Hippel−Lindau protein and the alpha subunit of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (pVHL:HIF-1α). Careful triaging allowed rescuing weak but specific binding of fragments that would otherwise escape detection at this PPI. Further structural information provided by saturation transfer difference (STD) group epitope mapping, protein-based NMR, competitive isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), and X-ray crystallography confirmed the binding mode of the rescued fragments. Our findings have important implications for PPI druggability assessment by fragment screening as they reveal an accessible threshold for fragment detection and validation.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/25236
ISSN: 1948-5875
DOI: 10.1021/ml400296c
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:FCTUC Ciências da Vida - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
ml400296c.pdf5.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

47
checked on Apr 1, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

48
checked on Apr 2, 2024

Page view(s)

277
checked on Apr 16, 2024

Download(s)

242
checked on Apr 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.