Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/115245
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, Ana C.-
dc.contributor.authorCanavarro, Maria Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, Helena-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-22T16:25:41Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-22T16:25:41Z-
dc.date.issued2020-08-06-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/115245-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to examine the (uni) dimensionality of the Parental Acceptance Questionnaire (6-PAQ) in a sample of Portuguese parents of children within the community using a bifactor model that can test the separate contribution of the dimensions and of the general score. 390 parents of children (1–11 years) recruited online and in-person completed the assessment protocol, including the 6 PAQ and other measures. The bifactor model showed the best fit to data (χ2(118) = 382.95, p < .001, CFI = .95). The degree of unidimensionality (.59) and the OmegaH indexes (.81 for the general factor and < .47 for the dimensions) supported the strength of the general factor of parental psychological flexibility, which accounted for 87% of the reliable variance in the total score. Reliability indices showed high reliability for the general factor (.93). Although the 6-PAQ contains items assessing the Hexaflex six core-processes, the results were globally supportive of the unidimensionality of the Portuguese version of the 6-PAQ, and thus of computing its total score.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherSpringerpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectBifactor modelpt
dc.subjectParental acceptance questionnairept
dc.subjectParental psychological flexibilitypt
dc.subjectPsychometric propertiespt
dc.subjectReliabilitypt
dc.subjectValiditypt
dc.titleIs parental psychological flexibility a (uni) dimensional construct? A bifactor analysis of the Portuguese version of the parental acceptance questionnaire (6-PAQ)pt
dc.typearticlept
degois.publication.titleCurrent Psychologypt
dc.date.updated2024-05-16T12:15:29Z-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-020-00991-ypt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12144-020-00991-y-
dc.description.version0F18-4278-46B8 | Ana Dias da Fonseca-
dc.description.versionN/A-
dc.identifier.slugcv-prod-2489243-
dc.date.embargo2020-08-06*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.researchunitCEMMPRE - Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes-
crisitem.author.researchunitCenter for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CINEICC)-
crisitem.author.researchunitCenter for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CINEICC)-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7145-2472-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5083-7322-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1487-0539-
Appears in Collections:FPCEUC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
I&D CINEICC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
fonseca2020.pdf602.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

19
checked on Jul 17, 2024

Download(s)

7
checked on Jul 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons