Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/113760
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Rui R.-
dc.contributor.authorPereira, André-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Liliana-
dc.contributor.authorEsteves, Alexandra-
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Sofia C.-
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Andreia-
dc.contributor.authorPena, Angelina-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-01T09:08:54Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-01T09:08:54Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-13-
dc.identifier.issn2304-8158pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/113760-
dc.description.abstractThe poultry industry, in order to prevent and control coccidiosis caused by Eimeria spp., widely uses coccidiostats as feed additives. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the presence of nine coccidiostats in 62 egg samples by UHPLC-MS/MS. Overall, detection frequency and average concentration were 90.3% (56/62) and 106.3 μg kg-1, respectively. Only diclazuril and nicarbazin were detected. Diclazuril, only found in home-raised eggs, showed an overall detection frequency of 8.1% (5/62), with average and maximum concentrations of 0.46 ± 1.90 μg kg-1 and 13.6 μg kg-1, respectively. Nicarbazin presented an overall higher frequency, 88.7% (55/62), with levels up to 744.8 μg kg-1. Additionally, four samples (6.5%) presented both nicarbazin and diclazuril. Home-raised egg samples (n = 28) showed a detection frequency of 89.3%, with nicarbazin found in more samples (85.7% vs. 17.9%) and at higher levels (266.3 ± 169.4 μg kg-1 vs. 0.91 ± 2.78 μg kg-1) when compared to diclazuril. In supermarket samples (n = 34), only nicarbazin was detected in 31 samples (91.1%), with an average of 167.6 ± 62.2 μg kg-1. Considering the average contamination scenario, consumers' health should not be adversely affected by egg consumption. In every scenario considered, children were the most vulnerable population group.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherMDPIpt
dc.relationUIDP/50006/2020pt
dc.relationUIDB/CVT/00772/2020,pt
dc.relationLA/P/0059/2020pt
dc.relationprogram DL 57/2016—Norma transitória (REF. DL-57- 2016/ICETA/02)pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectcoccidiostatspt
dc.subjecteggspt
dc.subjectUHLC-MS/MSpt
dc.subjectcommercial vs. home-raisedpt
dc.subjectsyntheticpt
dc.subjectionophorept
dc.titleRisk Assessment of Nine Coccidiostats in Commercial and Home-Raised Eggspt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage1225pt
degois.publication.issue6pt
degois.publication.titleFoodspt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/foods12061225pt
degois.publication.volume12pt
dc.date.embargo2023-03-13*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
crisitem.author.researchunitAssociated Laboratory for Green Chemistry - Clean Technologies and Processes-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7857-5694-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4777-4340-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2597-6651-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0902-647X-
Appears in Collections:FFUC- Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

18
checked on May 8, 2024

Download(s)

5
checked on May 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons