Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/112246
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTogawa, Riku-
dc.contributor.authorPfob, André-
dc.contributor.authorBüsch, Christopher-
dc.contributor.authorAlwafai, Zaher-
dc.contributor.authorBalleyguier, Corinne-
dc.contributor.authorClevert, Dirk-André-
dc.contributor.authorDuda, Volker-
dc.contributor.authorFastner, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorGonçalo, Manuela-
dc.contributor.authorGomez, Christina-
dc.contributor.authorGruber, Ines-
dc.contributor.authorHahn, Markus-
dc.contributor.authorHennigs, André-
dc.contributor.authorKapetas, Panagiotis-
dc.contributor.authorNees, Juliane-
dc.contributor.authorOhlinger, Ralf-
dc.contributor.authorRiedel, Fabian-
dc.contributor.authorRutten, Matthieu-
dc.contributor.authorSchäfgen, Benedikt-
dc.contributor.authorStieber, Anne-
dc.contributor.authorTozaki, Mitsuhiro-
dc.contributor.authorWojcinski, Sebastian-
dc.contributor.authorRauch, Geraldine-
dc.contributor.authorHeil, Jörg-
dc.contributor.authorBarr, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorGolatta, Michael-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-26T10:14:09Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-26T10:14:09Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-
dc.identifier.issn0278-4297pt
dc.identifier.issn1550-9613pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/112246-
dc.description.abstractObjectives—We evaluated whether lesion-to-fat ratio measured by shear wave elastography in patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) 3 or 4 lesions has the potential to further refine the assessment of Bmode ultrasound alone in breast cancer diagnostics. Methods—This was a secondary analysis of an international diagnostic multicenter trial (NCT02638935). Data from 1288 women with breast lesions categorized as BI-RADS 3 and 4a–c by conventional B-mode ultrasound were analyzed, whereby the focus was placed on differentiating lesions categorized as BI-RADS 3 and BI-RADS 4a. All women underwent shear wave elastography and histopathologic evaluation functioning as reference standard. Reduction of benign biopsies as well as the number of missed malignancies after reclassification using lesion-to-fat ratio measured by shear wave elastography were evaluated. Results—Breast cancer was diagnosed in 368 (28.6%) of 1288 lesions. The assessment with conventional B-mode ultrasound resulted in 53.8% (495 of 1288) pathologically benign lesions categorized as BI-RADS 4 and therefore false positives as well as in 1.39% (6 of 431) undetected malignancies categorized as BI-RADS 3. Additional lesion-to-fat ratio in BI-RADS 4a lesions with a cutoff value of 1.85 resulted in 30.11% biopsies of benign lesions which correspond to a reduction of 44.04% of false positives. Conclusions—Adding lesion-to-fat ratio measured by shear wave elastography to conventional B-mode ultrasound in BI-RADS 4a breast lesions could help reduce the number of benign biopsies by 44.04%. At the same time, however, 1.98% of malignancies were missed, which would still be in line with American College of Radiology BI-RADS 3 definition of <2% of undetected malignancies.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellpt
dc.relationOpen Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt
dc.subjectB-mode ultrasoundpt
dc.subjectbiopsypt
dc.subjectbreast cancer diagnosticspt
dc.subjectshear wave elastographypt
dc.subject.meshHumanspt
dc.subject.meshFemalept
dc.subject.meshSensitivity and Specificitypt
dc.subject.meshUltrasonography, Mammarypt
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Resultspt
dc.subject.meshBiopsypt
dc.subject.meshElasticitypt
dc.subject.meshDiagnosis, Differentialpt
dc.subject.meshElasticity Imaging Techniquespt
dc.subject.meshBreast Neoplasmspt
dc.titlePotential of Lesion-to-Fat Elasticity Ratio Measured by Shear Wave Elastography to Reduce Benign Biopsies in BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesionspt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage1729pt
degois.publication.lastPage1736pt
degois.publication.issue8pt
degois.publication.titleJournal of Ultrasound in Medicinept
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jum.16192pt
degois.publication.volume42pt
dc.date.embargo2023-08-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

37
checked on Jul 17, 2024

Download(s)

21
checked on Jul 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons