Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/111994
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBueno de la Fuente, Gema-
dc.contributor.authorAgustín-Lacruz, Carmen-
dc.contributor.authorFujita, Mariângela Spotti Lopes-
dc.contributor.authorTerra, Ana Lúcia-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-18T11:03:50Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-18T11:03:50Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn0264-0473pt
dc.identifier.issn0264-0473pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/111994-
dc.description.abstractPurpose - The aim of this work is to analyse the recommendations on knowledge organisation from guidelines, policies, and procedure manuals of a sample of institutional repositories and networks within the Latin American area and observe the level of follow-up of international guidelines. Methodology – Presented is an exploratory and descriptive study of repositories’ professional documents. The study comprised four steps: 1. definition of convenience sample; 2. development of data codebook; 3. coding of data; and 4. analysis of data and conclusions drawing. The convenience sample includes representative sources at three levels: local institutional repositories, national aggregators, and international network and aggregators. The codebook gathers information from the repositories’ sample, such as: institutional rules and procedure manuals openly available, or recommendations on the use of controlled vocabularies. Findings - The results indicate that at the local repository level, the use of controlled vocabularies is not regulated, leaving the choice of terms to the authors’ discretion. It results in a set of unstructured keywords, not standardised terms, mixing subject terms with other authorities on persons, institutions, or places. National aggregators do not regulate these issues either, and limit to pointing to international guidelines and policies, which simply recommend the use of controlled vocabularies, using URIs to facilitate interoperability. Originality - The originality of the study lies in identifying how the principles of knowledge organisation are effectively applied by institutional repositories, at local, national, and international levels.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherEmerald Publishingpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectKnowledge organisationpt
dc.subjectInstitutional repositoriespt
dc.subjectAcademic repositoriespt
dc.subjectPoliciespt
dc.subjectProcedure manualspt
dc.subjectGuidelinespt
dc.subjectOpenAIREpt
dc.subjectOasisbrpt
dc.subjectCOARpt
dc.subjectRCAAPpt
dc.subjectRecolectapt
dc.subjectLA Referenciapt
dc.titleKnowledge organisation in institutional repositories: a case study on policies and procedures manuals in the Ibero-American environmentpt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage770pt
degois.publication.lastPage786pt
degois.publication.issue6pt
degois.publication.titleElectronic Librarypt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/EL-05-2023-0128pt
degois.publication.volume41pt
dc.date.embargo2023-01-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
crisitem.author.researchunitCEIS20 - Centre of 20th Century Interdisciplinary Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1292-2849-
Appears in Collections:FLUC Secção de Informação - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Knowledge organisation in institutional repositories.pdf787.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

42
checked on May 8, 2024

Download(s)

24
checked on May 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons