Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/111917
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoraes, Matheus Henrique Morato de-
dc.contributor.authorFraga, Iuri Fazolin-
dc.contributor.authorMenezes, Isabella Silva-
dc.contributor.authorLahr, Francisco Antonio Rocco-
dc.contributor.authorPanzera, Tulio Hallak-
dc.contributor.authorFreire, Rodrigo Teixeira Santos-
dc.contributor.authorDias, Alfredo Manuel Pereira Geraldes-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Herisson Ferreira dos-
dc.contributor.authorFaustino, Emerson-
dc.contributor.authorPereira Junior, Wanderlei Malaquias-
dc.contributor.authorChristoforo, André Luis-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-16T12:49:21Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-16T12:49:21Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn2075-5309-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/111917-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to compare the mechanical performance of two truss typologies, the modified Fan and Howe trusses, using five different wood species: Cambará-rosa, Cupiúba, Angelimpedra, Garapa, and Jatobá. The spans considered were 6, 9, 12, and 15 m, and the optimization algorithm used was a swarm intelligence algorithm to minimize the structure weight. The study found that wood is a sustainable and viable option for truss constructions, with different wood species having distinct mechanical properties that must be considered when designing the structure. The Howe truss typology presented lower results for the objective function in comparison with the modified Fan truss. The distribution of normal forces in the truss correlated with the characteristic strength in compression and tensile of the species. The Howe truss typology presented a larger amplitude in relation to the modified Fan truss typology in most of the conditions adopted for the Ultimate Limit State constraints. Constraints associated with deflection in the immediate condition were observed to limit the optimization process. The study used the matrix analysis method to evaluate internal efforts and nodal displacements in the trusses. In summary, this study demonstrates the importance of considering all constraints when dimensioning timber structures and the benefits of using different wood species for sustainable construction.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherMDPIpt
dc.relationCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brasil (CAPES), finance code 001pt
dc.relationPró-Reitoria de Pesquisa, Inovação e Pós-Graduação of Instituto Federal de Rondônia (PROPESP/IFRO), finance code 002pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectflat wooden trussespt
dc.subjectoptimizationpt
dc.subjectHowept
dc.subjectmodified Fanpt
dc.subjectnative woodpt
dc.titleComparative Analysis of the Mechanical Performance of Timber Flat Truss Typologies for Different Strength Classes via Optimization Algorithmpt
dc.typearticlept
degois.publication.firstPage1946pt
degois.publication.issue8pt
degois.publication.titleBuildingspt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings13081946-
degois.publication.volume13pt
dc.date.embargo2023-01-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
Appears in Collections:FCTUC Eng.Civil - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
I&D ISISE - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on May 15, 2024

Download(s)

21
checked on May 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons