Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/109300
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Brigida Costa-
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Rui Vale-
dc.contributor.authorKhouri, Leila-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Tânia-
dc.contributor.authorSá-Couto, Pedro-
dc.contributor.authordo Carmo Lopes, Maria-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-09T11:05:37Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-09T11:05:37Z-
dc.date.issued2015-02-15-
dc.identifier.issn1748-717Xpt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/109300-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the differences between three methods of classification of recurrences in patients with head and neck tumours treated with Radiation Therapy (RT). Materials and methods: 367 patients with head and neck tumours were included in the study. Tumour recurrences were delineated in the CT images taken during patient follow-up and deformable registration was used to transfer this volume into the planning CT. The methods used to classify recurrences were: method CTV quantified the intersection volume between the recurrence and the Clinical Target Volume (CTV); method TV quantified the intersection between the Treated Volume and the recurrence (for method CTV and TV, recurrences were classified in-field if more than 95% of their volume were inside the volume of interest, marginal if the intersection was between 20-95% and outfield otherwise); and method COM was based on the position of the Centre Of Mass of the recurrence. A dose assessment in the recurrence volume was also made. Results: The 2-year Kaplan-Meier locoregional recurrence incidence was 10%. Tumour recurrences occurred in 22 patients in a mean time of 16.5 ± 9.4 months resulting in 28 recurrence volumes. The percentage of in-field recurrences for methods CTV, TV and COM was 7%, 43% and 50%, respectively. Agreement between the three methods in characterizing individually in-field and marginal recurrences was found only in six cases. Methods CTV and COM agreed in 14. The percentage of outfield recurrences was 29% using all methods. For local recurrences (in-field or marginal to gross disease) the average difference between the prescribed dose and D98% in the recurrence volume was -5.2 ± 3.5% (range: -10.1%-0.9%). Conclusions: The classification of in-field and marginal recurrences is very dependent on the method used to characterize recurrences. Using methods TV and COM the largest percentage of tumour recurrences occurred in-field in tissues irradiated with high doses.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherSpringer Naturept
dc.relationFCT - PEst-C/CTM/LA0025/2011pt
dc.relationCIDMA - Center for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applicationspt
dc.relationFCT -PEst-OE/MAT/UI4106/2014pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectHead and neck tumourspt
dc.subjectRadiation therapypt
dc.subjectCharacterization of tumour recurrencespt
dc.subjectGeometric methodspt
dc.subjectDosimetric assessmentpt
dc.subject.meshAdolescentpt
dc.subject.meshAdultpt
dc.subject.meshAgedpt
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and overpt
dc.subject.meshCarcinoma, Squamous Cellpt
dc.subject.meshChildpt
dc.subject.meshFemalept
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studiespt
dc.subject.meshHead and Neck Neoplasmspt
dc.subject.meshHumanspt
dc.subject.meshMalept
dc.subject.meshMiddle Agedpt
dc.subject.meshNeoplasm Recurrence, Localpt
dc.subject.meshNeoplasm Stagingpt
dc.subject.meshPrognosispt
dc.subject.meshRadiotherapypt
dc.subject.meshRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedpt
dc.subject.meshRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulatedpt
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studiespt
dc.subject.meshRisk Assessmentpt
dc.subject.meshSurvival Ratept
dc.subject.meshTomography, X-Ray Computedpt
dc.subject.meshYoung Adultpt
dc.titleAssessment and topographic characterization of locoregional recurrences in head and neck tumourspt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage41pt
degois.publication.issue1pt
degois.publication.titleRadiation Oncologypt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13014-015-0345-4pt
degois.publication.volume10pt
dc.date.embargo2015-02-15*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5325-3090-
Appears in Collections:FCTUC Física - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

31
checked on May 8, 2024

Download(s)

14
checked on May 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons