Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/108618
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlho, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Sandra C.-
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Liliana P.-
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Elisa-
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Jacqueline H. T.-
dc.contributor.authorSorjonen, Kimmo-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Carlos F.-
dc.contributor.authorOlsson, Mats J.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-05T11:00:48Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-05T11:00:48Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/108618-
dc.description.abstractAlthough canine identification of body odor (BO) has been widely used as forensic evidence, the concept of nosewitness identification by human observers was only recently put to the test. The results indicated that BOs associated with male characters in authentic crime videos could later be identified in BO lineup tests well above chance. To further evaluate nosewitness memory, we assessed the effects of lineup size (Experiment 1) and retention interval (Experiment 2), using a forced-choice memory test. The results showed that nosewitness identification works for all lineup sizes (3, 5, and 8 BOs), but that larger lineups compromise identification performance in similarity to observations from eye- and earwitness studies. Also in line with previous eye- and earwitness studies, but in disagreement with some studies on odor memory, Experiment 2 showed significant forgetting between shorter retention intervals (15 min) and longer retention intervals (1-week) using lineups of five BOs. Altogether this study shows that identification of BO in a forensic setting is possible and has limits and characteristics in line with witness identification through other sensory modalities.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.pt
dc.relationSFRH/BD/78911/2011pt
dc.relationSwedishResearchCouncil(421–2012–1125)pt
dc.relationthe Swedish Foundation for Humanities and Social Sciences (P12–1017 to MO)pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectnosewitnesspt
dc.subjectforensic psychologypt
dc.subjectlineup identificationpt
dc.subjectlineup sizept
dc.subjectretention intervalpt
dc.titleNosewitness Identification: Effects of Lineup Size and Retention Intervalpt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage713pt
degois.publication.titleFrontiers in Psychologypt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00713pt
degois.publication.volume7pt
dc.date.embargo2016-01-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0534-0322-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1399-6674-
Appears in Collections:FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
I&D IBILI - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

39
checked on May 8, 2024

Download(s)

14
checked on May 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons