Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/10742
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNussbaumer, Alain-
dc.contributor.authorWalbridge, Scott-
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-21T08:42:34Z-
dc.date.available2009-07-21T08:42:34Z-
dc.date.issued2008-02-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Constructional Steel Research. 64:2 (2008) 156–166en_US
dc.identifier.issn0143-974X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/10742-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the extent to which post-weld treatment by needle peening can improve the fatigue performance of tubular truss bridges. To do this, the various potential crack sites on several variants of a typical bridge are analyzed using a probabilistic, fracture mechanics-based model. Systems reliability theory is then used to determine the reliability of the entire untreated or treated bridge. The results of this work show that: considering phase effects may result in large reductions in the design stress ranges for these structures, a significant increase in the treatment benefit can be achieved if the treatment is applied after the dead load stresses are introduced, and weld root cracking does not appear to be the critical failure mode for these structures, so long as a strategy of partial treatment is employed.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectTubular truss bridgesen_US
dc.subjectFatigueen_US
dc.subjectPost-weld treatmenten_US
dc.subjectNeedle peeningen_US
dc.subjectProbabilistic fracture mechanicsen_US
dc.titleProbabilistic fatigue analysis of shop and field treated tubular truss bridgesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.06.001-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:FCTUC Eng.Civil - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Apr 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 10

5
checked on May 2, 2024

Page view(s)

247
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Download(s)

265
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.