Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/106468
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLisi, Marco-
dc.contributor.authorLuís, Carla-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-04T10:52:27Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-04T10:52:27Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-24-
dc.identifier.issn2673-3145pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/106468-
dc.description.abstractThe use of electronic voting has been considered an important tool to improve electoral processes in some circumstances, with potential effects in party-voter linkages and participation. However, many countries are skeptical in adopting this digital tool and there are relevant shortcomings in the implementation of electronic voting. Despite favorable conditions for the innovation in voting mechanisms, Portugal is one of the countries still considering the possibility to introduce e-voting. This study argues that we need to consider not only the context in which e-voting takes place, but also the key role of party agents. Drawing on interviews with party officials and experts, primary data collection and media sources, this paper shows that in Portugal e-voting is not regarded as a potential tool to improve the electoral process due to the high level of trust and quality of traditional voting mechanisms, as well as due to the divergent interest of political parties. In addition, party organizations are not familiar with the use of digital tools in terms of grassroot mobilization. Overall, the findings indicate that party barriers are also key for allowing the (non)adoption of e-voting.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediapt
dc.relationPTDC/CPO-CPO/30296/2017pt
dc.relationUIDB/04627/2020pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectElectronic votingpt
dc.subjectOnline votingpt
dc.subjectPolitical partiespt
dc.subjectElectioneeringpt
dc.subjectElectoral systemspt
dc.subjectPortugalpt
dc.title(Un)ready for change? The debate about electronic voting in Portugal and its implementation before and after the pandemic erapt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage876866pt
degois.publication.locationLausannept
degois.publication.titleFrontiers in Political Sciencept
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.876866pt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpos.2022.876866pt
degois.publication.volume4pt
dc.date.embargo2022-11-24*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
crisitem.author.researchunitCES – Centre for Social Studies-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitUniversity of Coimbra-
Appears in Collections:I&D CES - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Un_ready for change_The debate about.pdf325.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

59
checked on May 8, 2024

Download(s)

22
checked on May 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons