Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/105416
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLoureiro, Cláudia Chaves-
dc.contributor.authorBranco Ferreira, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Jorge-
dc.contributor.authorLima, Ricardo-
dc.contributor.authorMarques, João-
dc.contributor.authorSokolova, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorTonin, Fernanda S.-
dc.contributor.authorDuarte Ramos, Filipa-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T10:48:26Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-27T10:48:26Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn25310437pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/105416-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and objectives: We aimed to build a national consensus to optimize the use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) in severe asthma in Portugal. Material and methods: A modified 3-round Delphi including 65 statements (topics on chronic systemic corticotherapy, therapeutic schemes, asthma safety and monitoring) was performed via online platform (October-November 2019). A five-point Likert-type scale was used (1- ‘strongly disagree’; 5-‘strongly agree’). Consensus threshold was established as a percentage of agreement among participants ≥90% in the 1st round and ≥85% in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. The level of consensus achieved by the panel was discussed with the participants (face-to-face meeting). Results: Forty-eight expert physicians in severe asthma (specialists in allergology and pulmonology) participated in the study. Almost half of the statements (28/65; 43.1%) obtained positive consensus by the end of round one. By the end of the exercise, 12 (18.5%) statements did not achieve consensus. Overall, 87% of physicians agree that further actions for OCS cumu-lative risk assessment in acute asthma exacerbations are needed. The vast majority (91.7%)demonstrated a favorable perception for using biological agents whenever patients are eligible.Most participants (95.8%) are more willing to accept some degree of lung function deteriorationcompared to other outcomes (worsening of symptoms, quality of life) when reducing OCS dose.Monitoring patients’ comorbidities was rated as imperative by all experts.Conclusions: : These results can guide an update on asthma management in Portugal and shouldbe supplemented by studies on therapy access, patients’ adherence, and costs.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherElsevier Espana S.L.Upt
dc.relationAstraZenecapt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt
dc.subjectAsthmapt
dc.subjectOral corticosteroidspt
dc.subjectDelphi panelpt
dc.subjectConsensuspt
dc.subject.meshAdrenal Cortex Hormonespt
dc.subject.meshAsthmapt
dc.subject.meshConsensuspt
dc.subject.meshDelphi Techniquept
dc.subject.meshHumanspt
dc.subject.meshPortugalpt
dc.subject.meshQuality of Lifept
dc.titleReducing oral corticosteroids in severe asthma (ROSA Project): a nationwide Portuguese consensuspt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage313pt
degois.publication.lastPage327pt
degois.publication.issue4pt
degois.publication.titlePulmonologypt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.10.002pt
degois.publication.volume27pt
dc.date.embargo2021-01-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
Appears in Collections:FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
1-s2.0-S2531043720302178-main.pdf750.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons