Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/103877
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Sophie-
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Donal-
dc.contributor.authorCárdenas Álvarez, Juan Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorChitchyan, Ruzanna-
dc.contributor.authorFell, Michael J.-
dc.contributor.authorHahnel, Ulf J. J.-
dc.contributor.authorHojckova, Kristina-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Charlotte-
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Lurian-
dc.contributor.authorMontakhabi, Mehdi-
dc.contributor.authorSay, Kelvin-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Abhigyan-
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Nicole-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-06T11:49:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-06T11:49:52Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/103877-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, numerous studies have explored the opportunities and challenges for emerging decentralized energy systems and business models. However, few studies have focussed specifically on the economic and social value associated with three emerging models: peer-to-peer energy trading (P2P), community self-consumption (CSC) and transactive energy (TE). This article presents the findings of a systematic literature review to address this gap. The paper makes two main contributions to the literature. Firstly, it offers a synthesis of research on the social and economic value of P2P, CSC and TE systems, concluding that there is evidence for a variety of sources of social value (including energy independence, local benefits, social relationships, environmental responsibility and participation and purpose) and economic value (including via self-consumption of renewable electricity, reduced electricity import costs, and improved electricity export prices). Secondly, it identifies factors and conditions necessary for the success of these models, which include willingness to participate, participant engagement with technology, and project engagement of households and communities, among other factors. Finally, it discusses conflicts and trade-offs in the value propositions of the models, how the three models differ from one another in terms of the value they aim to deliver and some of the open challenges that require further attention by researchers and practitioners.pt
dc.description.sponsorshipThis publication is part of the work of the Global Observatory on Peer-to-Peer, Community Self-Consumption and Transactive Energy Models (GO-P2P), a Task of the User-Centred Energy Systems Technology Collaboration Programme (Users TCP), under the auspices of the International Energy Agency (IEA). GO-P2P benefits from the support of Australia, Belgium, Ireland, Italy, The Netherlands, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and United States. S.A. is funded by the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) as part of ARENA’s International Engagement Program. D.B. is funded by the European Commission Horizon 2020 projects: PROSumers in the Energy Union (PROSEU) grant agreement No. 764056; and grant agreement No. 814945 (SolBio-Rev). J.P.C.Á. is funded by the UK Royal Academy of Engineering through a Transforming Systems through Partnership 20/21 Award (TSP2021/100067). R.C. is funded through UK Research & Innovation grants RES (EP/R007373/1) and EnergyREV (EP/S031863/1). M.J.F. is funded through UK Research and Innovation through the Centre for Research into Energy Demand Solutions, grant reference number EP/R035288/1, and UK Research and Innovation Grant No EP/S031863/1 “Energy Revolution Research Consortium—Core—EnergyREV”, administered by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). C.J. is funded by UK Research and Innovation through CREDS (EP/R035288/1). M.M. is funded by the Flemish Government through FWO SBO project SNIPPET S007619. N.W. is funded by UK Research and Innovation through the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Energy Demand (EP/LO1517X/1).-
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherMDPIpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectsocial valuept
dc.subjecteconomic valuept
dc.subjectpeer-to-peer electricity tradingpt
dc.subjectcommunity self-consumptionpt
dc.subjecttransactive energypt
dc.subjectenergy business modelspt
dc.titleSocial and Economic Value in Emerging Decentralized Energy Business Models: A Critical Reviewpt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage7864pt
degois.publication.issue23pt
degois.publication.titleEnergiespt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en14237864pt
degois.publication.volume14pt
dc.date.embargo2021-01-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0435-192X-
Appears in Collections:FCTUC Eng.Mecânica - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
checked on May 2, 2023

Page view(s)

93
checked on Jul 17, 2024

Download(s)

56
checked on Jul 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons