Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/103681
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Valverde, Nansi-
dc.contributor.authorPardal-Peláez, Beatriz-
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Valverde, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorFlores-Fraile, Javier-
dc.contributor.authorHerrero-Hernández, Silvia-
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Bruno Macedo de-
dc.contributor.authorHerrero-Payo, Julio-
dc.contributor.authorRamírez, Juan Manuel-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-21T10:42:15Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-21T10:42:15Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-10-
dc.identifier.issn2076-3921pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/103681-
dc.description.abstractIn recent times, the use of natural products has gained momentum, either as a treatment or as adjuvants for other drugs in the treatment of different conditions. Propolis is a natural substance produced by bees which has proven useful for treating periodontal disease. This systematic review and meta-analysis gather evidence of the effectiveness of propolis in this kind of condition. The MEDLINE, CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched for scientific articles to identify the findings published up to October 2020. The MeSH phrases used in the search were: "periodontal diseases AND propolis treatment"; "gingivitis AND propolis treatment"; "periodontitis AND propolis treatment"; "propolis treatment AND oral health"; "propolis AND oxidative stress AND periodontitis". The Boolean operator "AND" was used to combine the searches. Randomized trials where propolis was used in the treatment of different periodontal conditions were included. Non-randomized clinical studies were systematically reviewed and 224 studies were detected, eight of which met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Only three of these were selected for quantitative synthesis. In conclusion, propolis is safe to use and can improve the results of periodontal disease treatment, reducing probing pocket depth compared with treatment with a placebo (difference in means, fixed effects -0.67 [95% CI: -0.84, -0.50]).pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherMDPIpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectpropolispt
dc.subjectperiodontal disease/periodontitispt
dc.subjectgingivitispt
dc.subjectoral healthpt
dc.subjectoxidative stresspt
dc.titleEffectiveness of Propolis in the Treatment of Periodontal Disease: Updated Systematic Review with Meta-Analysispt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage269pt
degois.publication.issue2pt
degois.publication.titleAntioxidantspt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/antiox10020269pt
degois.publication.volume10pt
dc.date.embargo2021-02-10*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
Appears in Collections:FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
checked on May 2, 2023

Page view(s)

32
checked on May 14, 2024

Download(s)

87
checked on May 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons