Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/101758
Title: Fluctuación prefijal en el gallego-portugués y en el castellano medievales
Other Titles: Prefixal fluctuation in Galician-Portuguese and Medieval Castilian
Authors: Rio-Torto, Graça 
Lopes, Mailson
Keywords: Gallego-portugués medieval; castellano antiguo; variación y cambio; fluctuación prefijal; Galician-Portuguese; Old Castilian; variation and change; prefixal fluctuation
Issue Date: 2019
Project: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior ‒ Brasil (CAPES) ‒ Código de Financiamento 001 
Celga-Iltec ‒ Centro de Estudos de Lingüística Geral e Aplicada (Universidad de Coimbra) 
Serial title, monograph or event: Estudos de Linguistica Galega
Volume: 11
Abstract: En el gallego-portugués medieval y en el castellano antiguo coexisten verbos corradicales con y sin prefijo (acuydar y cuydar, esguardar y guardar), semánticamente equivalentes o aproximados. Paralelamente, en el portugués y en el castellano actuales hay formas como agradecer, otrora no prefijados (gradecer). Ambos procesos de pérdida o añadidura prefijales actúan involucrados en flujos de variación y cambio, resultando comúnmente en el solapamiento de una de las voces, durante o tras el medievo. Se propone una reflexión sobre las motivaciones de estos diferentes trayectos prefijales, considerándose la estructura de la base verbal, la naturaleza del prefijo, en el latín y en romance, y factores de naturaleza externa que pueden estar en la base de la coexistencia, durante varios siglos, de dos formas corradicales o de la pérdida de tal convivencia.
In Galician-Portuguese and in Old Castilian the coexistence of verbs with and without prefix (acuydar and cuydar, esguardar and guardar) that are semantically equivalent or with close meanings is attested. At the same time, in the current Spanish and Portuguese there are words like agradecer, not previously prefixed (gradecer). Both processes of prefix loss and prefix addition operate within the framework of the fluxes of variation and change of that period, commonly resulting in the overlap of one of the words during or after the Middle Ages. We propose to investigate the motivations of these different prefix trajectories, considering the structure of the verbal base, the nature of the prefix, in Latin and in Romance, and the external factors that support (i) the coexistence, during several centuries, of both forms sharing the same root or (ii) the loss of such coexistence.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/101758
ISSN: 1989-578X
1889-2566
DOI: 10.15304/elg.11.5105
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:I&D CELGA - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Nov 17, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on May 2, 2023

Page view(s)

69
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

95
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons