Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/42128
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Boaventura de Sousa-
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-27T14:58:15Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-27T14:58:15Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.issn0147-9032por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/42128-
dc.description.abstractModern Western thinking is an abyssal thinking. It operates through radical lines that divide social reality into two realms, the realm of “this side of the line” and the realm of “the other side of the line.” The division is such that “the other side of the line” vanishes as reality, becomes nonexistent, and is indeed produced as nonexistent. What most fundamentally characterizes abyssal thinking is thus the impossibility of the copresence of the two sides of the line. The other side of the abyssal line is the realm of beyond legality and illegality (lawlessness), of beyond truth and falsehood (incomprehensible beliefs, idolatry, magic). These forms of radical negation together result in a radical absence, the absence of humanity, modern subhumanity. This article argues that although colonialism provided the model for modern radical negation and exclusion, this is as true today as in the colonial period. Modern Western thinking goes on operating through abyssal lines that divide the human from the subhuman in such a way that human principles don’t get compromised by inhuman practices. First, the tension between regulation and emancipation (on this side of the line) continues to coexist with the tension between appropriation and violence (on the other side of the line) in such a way that the universality of the first tension is not contradicted by the existence of the second one. Secondly, abyssal lines continue to structure modern knowledge and modern law. Thirdly, these two abyssal lines are constitutive of Western-based political and cultural relations and interactions in the modern world-system. The struggle for global social justice must, therefore, be a struggle for global cognitive justice as well. In order to succeed, this struggle requires a new kind of thinking, a postabyssal thinking.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherBinghamton Universitypor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.titleBeyond Abyssal Thinking: From Global Lines to Ecologies of Knowledgespor
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage45por
degois.publication.lastPage89por
degois.publication.issue1por
degois.publication.locationNew Yorkpor
degois.publication.titleReviewpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.identifier.doi10.3726/978-1-4539-1797-8/12-
degois.publication.volume30por
uc.controloAutoridadeSim-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.researchunitCES – Centre for Social Studies-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitUniversity of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-3359-3626-
Aparece nas coleções:I&D CES - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato
Beyond Abyssal Thinking_From Global Lines to Ecologies of Knowledges.PDF31.21 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir
Mostrar registo em formato simples

Visualizações de página 5

1.559
Visto em 27/ago/2024

Downloads 20

2.261
Visto em 27/ago/2024

Google ScholarTM

Verificar

Altmetric

Altmetric


Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.