Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/36392
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorCarrilho, Eunice Virgínia Valdez Palmeirão-
dc.contributor.advisorFerreira, Manuel Marques-
dc.contributor.authorLaranjo, Ana Sofia Avidago-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-26T11:01:53Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-26T11:01:53Z-
dc.date.issued2013-06-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/36392-
dc.descriptionTrabalho final do 5º ano com vista à atribuição do grau de mestre no âmbito do ciclo de estudos de Mestrado Integrado em Medicina Dentária apresentado à Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Coimbra.por
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: OptiBond XTRTM recently introduced in the market is a new mild self-etch adhesive bonding agent which is claimed to feature an enhanced etching ability of the primer in order to the decrease of the pH. Aim: Evaluate the microleakage of dental restorations using OptibondTM XTR. The null hypothesis was that the type adhesive system doesn’t have influence in what concerns to microleakage. Materials and methods: Thirty noncarious extracted human molars were selected and cut in two equal halves occlusogingivally. Class V cavities (4mm/3mm/3mm) were prepared on the buccal or lingual surfaces of each tooth with gingival margin walls in enamel. The specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups: 1- OptibondTM XTR was applied; 2 –ClearfillTM SE BOND was applied; 3 – the cavities weren’t restored; 4 – OptibondTM XTR was applied. In groups 1, 2 and 4 the enamel was conditioned (37% orthophosphoric acid) before the adhesive application and restored with SonicFillTM. The specimens were stored in distilled water (37ºC, 7 days) and then went through thermocycling (500 cycles, 5ºC and 55ºC, dwell time 30’’). Two coats of nail polish were applied to the external surface around of each restoration except to the negative control group, where the crowns were completely sealed. The specimens were submersed in a solution of 99mTc-Pertechnetate. The radioactivity was counted 3 hours later. The nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test, with Bonferroni correction at a significance level of 5%, was used for statistical analyses. Results: Results showed that there weren’t statistically significant differences (p>0.05) among the groups restored with ClearfillTM SE and OptibondTM XTR. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the OptibondTM XTR doesn’t reduce microleakage compared to ClearfillTM SE BOND.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectDental adhesionpor
dc.subjectSelf-etch adhesivepor
dc.subjectComposite restorationspor
dc.subjectMicroleakagepor
dc.subjectPolymerization shrinkagepor
dc.subjectThermocyclingpor
dc.title99mTc in the evaluation of microleakage of composite resin restorations with OptibondTM XTR: in vitro study.por
dc.typemasterThesispor
thesis.degree.nameMestrado Integrado em Medicina Dentáriapor
item.openairetypemasterThesis-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
crisitem.advisor.orcid0000-0002-5759-5557-
crisitem.advisor.orcid0000-0002-5968-6161-
Appears in Collections:UC - Dissertações de Mestrado
FMUC Med. Dentária - Teses de Mestrado
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Trabalho I&D.pdfTrabalho I&D13.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

285
checked on Mar 26, 2024

Download(s) 50

358
checked on Mar 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.