Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/12861
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuerreiro, Rita J.-
dc.contributor.authorBeck, John-
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, J. Raphael-
dc.contributor.authorSantana, Isabel-
dc.contributor.authorRossor, Martin N.-
dc.contributor.authorSchott, Jonathan M.-
dc.contributor.authorNalls, Michael A.-
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Helena-
dc.contributor.authorSantiago, Beatriz-
dc.contributor.authorFox, Nick C.-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Catarina-
dc.contributor.authorCollinge, John-
dc.contributor.authorMead, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorSingleton, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorHardy, John-
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-12T09:18:33Z-
dc.date.available2010-03-12T09:18:33Z-
dc.date.issued2010-03-03-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. 5:3 (2010) e9510en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/12861-
dc.description.abstractRecently, two large genome wide association studies in Alzheimer disease (AD) have identified variants in three different genes (CLU, PICALM and CR1) as being associated with the risk of developing AD. The strongest association was reported for an intronic single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in CLU. To further characterize this association we have sequenced the coding region of this gene in a total of 495 AD cases and 330 healthy controls. A total of twenty-four variants were found in both cases and controls. For the changes found in more than one individual, the genotypic frequencies were compared between cases and controls. Coding variants were found in both groups (including a nonsense mutation in a healthy subject), indicating that the pathogenicity of variants found in this gene must be carefully evaluated. We found no common coding variant associated with disease. In order to determine if common variants at the CLU locus effect expression of nearby (cis) mRNA transcripts, an expression quantitative loci (eQTL) analysis was performed. No significant eQTL associations were observed for the SNPs previously associated with AD. We conclude that common coding variability at this locus does not explain the association, and that there is no large effect of common genetic variability on expression in brain tissue. We surmise that the most likely mechanism underpinning the association is either small effects of genetic variability on resting gene expression, or effects on damage induced expression of the proteinen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rightsopenAccessen_US
dc.titleGenetic Variability in CLU and Its Association with Alzheimer's Diseaseen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0009510-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.researchunitCNC - Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology-
crisitem.author.researchunitCNC - Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8114-9434-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6942-4328-
Appears in Collections:FCTUC Ciências da Vida - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Genetic Variability in CLU.pdf269.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

51
checked on May 1, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

45
checked on May 2, 2023

Page view(s)

346
checked on Apr 16, 2024

Download(s)

175
checked on Apr 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.