Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/107699
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMiranda, Ângela Sofia Cardoso-
dc.contributor.authorRosa, Andreia de Faria Martins-
dc.contributor.authorDias, Miguel José Patrício-
dc.contributor.authorHarvey, Ben M.-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Maria Fátima Loureiro da-
dc.contributor.authorCastelo-Branco, Miguel de Sá e Sousa-
dc.contributor.authorMurta, Joaquim Carlos Neto-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-27T11:53:47Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-27T11:53:47Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-01-
dc.identifier.issn1552-5783pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/107699-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE. To investigate the relation between optical properties, population receptive fields (pRFs), visual function, and subjectively perceived quality of vision after cataract surgery. METHODS. The study includes 30 patients who had recently undergone bilateral sequential cataract surgery. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and pRF modelling methods to assess pRF sizes across visual cortical regions (V1–V3). Subjects also performed a complete ophthalmologic and psychophysical examination and answered a quality of vision questionnaire. RESULTS. Subjects with worse optical properties had, as predicted, larger pRF sizes. In addition, analysis in the primary visual cortex revealed significantly larger mean pRF sizes for operated subjects with worse contrast sensitivity (P ¼ 0.038). In contrast, patients who scored high in the subjective ‘‘bothersome’’ dimension induced by dysphotic symptoms had surprisingly lower pRF size fitting interception (P ¼ 0.012) and pRF size fitting slopes (P ¼ 0.020), suggesting a dissociation between objective quality of vision and subjective appraisal. CONCLUSIONS. Optical properties of the eye influence pRF size. In particular, visual aberrations have a negative impact on visual cortical processing. A novel dissociation between subjective reports of quality of vision and pRF sizes was further identified. This suggests that patients with better cortical resolution may have a negative subjective response possibly because of improved perception of dysphotic phenomena. pRF properties represent a valuable quantitative measure to objectively evaluate quality of vision but do not necessarily predict subjective complaints.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmologypt
dc.relationUID/NEU/04539/2013pt
dc.relationPOCI- 01-0145-FEDER-007440pt
dc.relationD. Manuel de Mello grant 2014 (José de Mello Saúde, Portugal)pt
dc.relationResearch Support Office grant of the Faculty of Medicine of Coimbra Universitypt
dc.relationClinical Research Awards 2015 of the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS)pt
dc.relationBIGDATIMAGE – From computational modelling and clinical research to the development of neuroimaging big data platforms for discovery of novel biomarkerpt
dc.relationCENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000016pt
dc.relationICNAS-Produçãopt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt
dc.subjectquality of visionpt
dc.subjectfMRIpt
dc.subjectpopulation receptive fieldspt
dc.subjectdysphotic symptomspt
dc.subjectvisual cortical processingpt
dc.subject.meshAberrometrypt
dc.subject.meshAdultpt
dc.subject.meshAgedpt
dc.subject.meshCorneapt
dc.subject.meshCorneal Topographypt
dc.subject.meshCross-Sectional Studiespt
dc.subject.meshFemalept
dc.subject.meshHumanspt
dc.subject.meshMagnetic Resonance Imagingpt
dc.subject.meshMalept
dc.subject.meshMiddle Agedpt
dc.subject.meshMultifocal Intraocular Lensespt
dc.subject.meshPseudophakiapt
dc.subject.meshSurveys and Questionnairespt
dc.subject.meshVision, Ocularpt
dc.subject.meshVisual Acuitypt
dc.subject.meshVisual Cortexpt
dc.subject.meshVisual Fieldspt
dc.subject.meshLens Implantation, Intraocularpt
dc.subject.meshPhacoemulsificationpt
dc.titleOptical Properties Influence Visual Cortical Functional Resolution After Cataract Surgery and Both Dissociate From Subjectively Perceived Quality of Visionpt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage986pt
degois.publication.lastPage994pt
degois.publication.issue2pt
degois.publication.titleInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciencept
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1167/iovs.17-22321pt
degois.publication.volume59pt
dc.date.embargo2018-02-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.researchunitCNC - Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology-
crisitem.author.researchunitCIBIT - Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research-
crisitem.author.researchunitCNC - Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6608-3353-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3270-7575-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4364-6373-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8926-5176-
Appears in Collections:FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
I&D ICNAS - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
I&D IBILI - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

104
checked on Aug 28, 2024

Download(s)

59
checked on Aug 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons