Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/105818
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPalma, Paulo J.-
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Joana A.-
dc.contributor.authorCasau, Margarida-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, André-
dc.contributor.authorCaramelo, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorFalacho, Rui I.-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, João Miguel-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-09T10:58:04Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-09T10:58:04Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-28-
dc.identifier.issn2227-9059pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/105818-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to compare root-end preparation performed with two different ultrasonic tips-CVDentus and NSK-and respective time requirements. After root-end resection, 32 teeth were randomly divided in two groups, according to the ultrasonic tip used for root-end preparation. Preparation time was recorded. Photomicrographs were taken to assess the following parameters: root surface microcracking, marginal integrity and presence of debris. One ultrasonic tip from each group was analyzed through scanning electron microscopy before and after root-end preparation. The significance level was set at α = 0.05. Incidence of microcracks in both groups was 12.5%. Solely intracanal microcracking was found, consistently positioned within the widest side of the remaining dentine. No statistically significant differences were verified between both experimental groups regarding marginal integrity (p = 0.102) and preparation time (p = 0.780), whereas statistical differences (p = 0.003) were found concerning the presence of debris (the minimum registered score was mostly verified in CVDentus group). NSK tips showed major morphological changes, with extensive surface wear and noticeable loss of particles, which was not verified on CVDentus tips. Our findings suggest significant differences regarding root-end preparation walls quality, with CVDentus tips showing better results. Concerning microcracking, as well as preparation time and marginal integrity, both ultrasonic tips showed similar results. Qualitative analysis exposed NSK tips major morphological changes and wear after use, which was not verified on CVDentus tips.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherMDPIpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectapical surgerypt
dc.subjectendodontic microsurgerypt
dc.subjectroot-end preparationpt
dc.subjectultrasonicpt
dc.subjectultrasonic tipspt
dc.titleEvaluation of Root-End Preparation with Two Different Endodontic Microsurgery Ultrasonic Tipspt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage383pt
degois.publication.issue10pt
degois.publication.titleBiomedicinespt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/biomedicines8100383pt
degois.publication.volume8pt
dc.date.embargo2020-09-28*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.researchunitICBR Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4730-8072-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0015-8604-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7099-8871-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2865-9689-
Appears in Collections:FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
FMUC Med. Dentária - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
I&D ICBR - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
checked on Aug 26, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
checked on Aug 2, 2024

Page view(s)

122
checked on Aug 27, 2024

Download(s)

66
checked on Aug 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons