Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo:
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/101520
Título: | A GIS-MCDA Approach Addressing Economic-Social-Environmental Concerns for Selecting the Most Suitable Compressed Air Energy Storage Reservoirs | Autor: | Matos, Catarina R. Carneiro, Júlio F. Silva, Patrícia Pereira da Henriques, Carla O. |
Palavras-chave: | compressed air energy storage; potential underground reservoirs; economic-socialenvironmental concerns; multi-criteria decision analysis; simple additive weighting; sensibility analysis | Data: | 18-Out-2021 | Editora: | MDPI | Projeto: | POCI-01-0145-FEDER-029820/T4ENERTEC Tools for supporting the selection of energy efficient technologies info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UID/Multi/00308/2020/PT/Institute for Systems Engineering and Computers at Coimbra info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/FARH/SFRH/BD/117722/2016/PT/Armazenamento de Energia em Ar Comprimido: o seu Potencial e Viabilidade Económica em Portugal. info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UID/GEO/04683/2019/PT/INSTITUTE OF EARTH SCIENCES POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007690 UIDB/05037/2020 |
Título da revista, periódico, livro ou evento: | Energies | Volume: | 14 | Número: | 20 | Resumo: | This article presents an assessment of the most suitable compressed air energy storage (CAES) reservoirs and facilities to better integrate renewable energy into the electricity grid. The novelty of this study resides in selecting the best CAES reservoir sites through the application of a multi-criteria decision aid (MCDA) tool, specifically the simple additive weighting (SAW) method. Besides using geographic information systems (GIS) spatial representation of potential reservoir areas, for the MCDA method, several spatial criteria, environmental and social constraints, and positive incentives (e.g., the proximity to existing power generation facilities of renewable energy sources) were contemplated. As a result, sixty-two alternatives or potential reservoir sites were identified, and thirteen criteria (seven constraints and six incentives) were considered. The final stage of this study consisted of conducting a sensitivity analysis to determine the robustness of the solutions obtained and giving insights regarding each criterion’s influence on the reservoir sites selected. The three best suitable reservoir sites obtained were the Monte Real salt dome, Sines Massif, and the Campina de Cima—Loulé salt mine. The results show that this GIS-MCDA methodological framework, integrating spatial and non-spatial information, proved to provide a multidimensional view of the potential reservoir CAES systems incorporating both constraints and incentives. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10316/101520 | ISSN: | 1996-1073 | DOI: | 10.3390/en14206793 | Direitos: | openAccess |
Aparece nas coleções: | I&D INESCC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais I&D CeBER - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais I&D ISISE - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais |
Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021_Matos_PereiradaSilva_Henriques_Carneiro_GIS_MCDA_CAES_Energies-14-06793.pdf | 1.69 MB | Adobe PDF | Ver/Abrir |
Citações WEB OF SCIENCETM
2
Visto em 2/mai/2023
Visualizações de página
105
Visto em 28/ago/2024
Downloads
67
Visto em 28/ago/2024
Google ScholarTM
Verificar
Altmetric
Altmetric
Este registo está protegido por Licença Creative Commons